Claims & Evidence Tracker

Significant statements, tracked over time with context and status. Purpose is epistemic clarity — never ridicule. Positions evolve; we document that too.

CL-001 · 2021-10 · replication-rate claim

“I have found a way to see the source code reliably, 100% of the time.”

Claimed by: Danny Goler — Initial message to Dr. Andrew Gallimore

Context: Private message quoted publicly by Gallimore in his January 2025 essay.

Status: Contradicted in its universal form (Veilbreak contains null results); the 100% figure has no public auditable basis.

Later development: By 2025-2026 Goler's public framing emphasizes 'recurring/consistent' reports rather than universal success.

Sources: Alien Insect essay

CL-002 · 2025-01-08 · sample-size claim

“More than 1,000 participants have been studied under the protocol.”

Claimed by: Danny Goler — IPI Letters paper abstract/text

Context: Pilot study report claims >1,000 participants.

Status: Unresolved — paper is genuine and DOI-bearing but non-peer-reviewed (News & Views) and no participant-level dataset is public.

Sources: IPI Letters article page · Vice: ~300 followers per Goler as of Jan 2025 — tension with 1,000+ figure noted by commentators

CL-003 · 2020–present · cross-subject correspondence claim

“Different people see consistent, recurring code-like forms.”

Claimed by: Danny Goler — Interviews, paper, project sites

Context: Core claim across all appearances; wording varies from 'consistent descriptions' (paper) to stronger sameness language (promotion).

Status: Moderate for broadly similar categories of forms (self-report level); Not demonstrated for exact same-symbol/same-coordinate matching under blinded conditions.

Later development: Shawn Ryan Show #320 (2026-07): Vision Pro research framed as attempt to determine whether exact correspondence exists.

Sources: IPI Letters paper · SRS #320 transcript

CL-004 · 2024–2026 · project claim

“The Discovery documentary states thousands of documented sessions show the same characters.”

Claimed by: Documentary/project promotional material — The Discovery promotion/fundraising

Context: Promotional claims about session counts and cross-subject similarity.

Status: Claim made by documentary/project. DannyGoler.org has not identified a publicly auditable participant-level dataset corresponding to that figure.

Sources: GoFundMe campaign